- Home
- Venues
- County Ground, Chelmsford
- Women's T20
Chelmsford, England · Women's T20
County Ground, Chelmsford Women's T20 average score and records
Data through 7 July 2026Last updated 7 July 2026
The average first-innings score at County Ground, Chelmsford is 147.9, based on 20 completed first innings across 21 matches played between 2016 and 2026. That is 8.5 runs higher than the Women's T20 average of 139.4 across all grounds in the data. Of the 21 decided matches, 12 were won by the side batting second (57%) and 9 by the side batting first. The toss winner went on to win 13 of 21 decided matches (62%).
Matches
21
2016–2026
Avg 1st innings
147.9
20 completed innings
Avg 2nd innings
136.2
20 innings
Won chasing
57%
12 of 21 results
Toss winner won
62%
13 of 21
Average first-innings score by year
Show as table
| Year | Average first-innings score |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 132.0 |
| 2022 | 141.0 |
| 2024 | 156.5 |
| 2025 | 150.3 |
| 2026 | 157.3 |
Years with at least 2 completed first innings. Completed innings only; rain-rule results excluded.
Scoring by phase
| Phase | Innings | Avg runs | Avg wickets | Run rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Powerplay | 40 | 43.5 | 1.52 | 7.25 |
| Middle overs | 40 | 64.9 | 2.23 | 7.24 |
| Death overs | 38 | 35.4 | 2.47 | 7.95 |
T20 phases: overs 1–6, 7–15, 16–20 (The Hundred: first 25 balls, middle, last 25 balls). Run rate is runs per six legal balls.
Highest and lowest totals at County Ground, Chelmsford (Women's T20)
| Team | Score | Overs | Against | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hampshire Women | 195/2 | 20 | Essex Women | 2025-06-12 | Won |
| Essex Women | 185/1 | 19.1 | Surrey Women | 2026-07-05 | Won |
| Surrey Women | 184/4 | 20 | Essex Women | 2026-07-05 | Lost |
| Somerset Women | 178/8 | 19.5 | Essex Women | 2026-07-07 | Won |
| Essex Women | 177/5 | 20 | Somerset Women | 2026-07-07 | Lost |
| Team | Score | Overs | Against | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essex Women | 107 | 18.2 | Lancashire Women | 2025-07-16 | Lost |
| Sunrisers Women | 114 | 19 | Central Sparks Women | 2023-05-18 | Lost |
| Central Sparks Women | 137 | 19.5 | Sunrisers Women | 2023-05-18 | Won |
| The Blaze Women | 139 | 19.4 | Essex Women | 2025-07-13 | Won |
Most runs at County Ground, Chelmsford in Women's T20 matches
| Player | Inns | Runs | Avg | SR | HS | 100s | 50s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G Scrivens | 18 | 423 | 23.50 | 122.6 | 73 | 0 | 2 |
| AJ Macleod | 14 | 312 | 24.00 | 124.3 | 59 | 0 | 2 |
| J Gardner | 17 | 310 | 25.83 | 111.5 | 79 | 0 | 1 |
| CL Griffith | 12 | 283 | 25.73 | 131.6 | 68 | 0 | 3 |
| J Grewcock | 9 | 223 | 44.60 | 119.3 | 47 | 0 | 0 |
| Heather Knight | 4 | 151 | 37.75 | 126.9 | 66 | 0 | 2 |
| Charli Knott | 3 | 148 | 148.00 | 137.0 | 72 | 0 | 2 |
| Madeline Penna | 7 | 147 | 21.00 | 108.1 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| Lauren Winfield-Hill | 6 | 125 | 20.83 | 116.8 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
| A Bosch | 3 | 123 | 61.50 | 151.9 | 84 | 0 | 1 |
Most wickets at County Ground, Chelmsford in Women's T20 matches
| Player | Inns | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G Scrivens | 15 | 17 | 20.06 | 8.02 | 4/33 |
| EI MacGregor | 7 | 15 | 12.60 | 8.16 | 4/8 |
| Eva Gray | 16 | 14 | 31.86 | 8.08 | 4/18 |
| Sophia Smale | 14 | 11 | 31.18 | 7.17 | 2/13 |
| Amanda Wellington | 3 | 9 | 7.00 | 5.25 | 5/18 |
| S Munro | 7 | 9 | 21.33 | 7.16 | 4/23 |
| AH Maqsood | 10 | 9 | 22.33 | 7.18 | 2/16 |
| Georgia Adams | 3 | 7 | 11.86 | 6.92 | 4/26 |
| Mady Villiers | 7 | 6 | 30.00 | 6.92 | 3/28 |
| Madeline Penna | 4 | 5 | 13.80 | 5.75 | 2/11 |
Recent matches at County Ground, Chelmsford
| Date | Teams | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul 2026 | Essex Women 177/5 (20 ov) Somerset Women 178/8 (19.5 ov) | Somerset won by 2 wickets |
| 5 Jul 2026 | Surrey Women 184/4 (20 ov) Essex Women 185/1 (19.1 ov) | Essex won by 9 wickets |
| 28 Jun 2026 | Essex Women 136/9 (20 ov) The Blaze Women 137/1 (15.5 ov) | The Blaze won by 9 wickets |
| 7 Jun 2026 | Hampshire Women 155/4 (20 ov) Essex Women 100/9 (20 ov) | Hampshire won by 55 runs |
| 31 May 2026 | Lancashire Women 128/8 (20 ov) Essex Women 132/4 (17.5 ov) | Essex won by 6 wickets |
| 22 May 2026 | Warwickshire Women 164/8 (20 ov) Essex Women 166/3 (14.2 ov) | Essex won by 7 wickets |
| 18 Jul 2025 | Essex Women 164/3 (20 ov) Durham Women 155/8 (20 ov) | Essex won by 9 runs |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Essex Women 107 (18.2 ov) Lancashire Women 108/6 (19.5 ov) | Lancashire won by 4 wickets |
| 13 Jul 2025 | The Blaze Women 139 (19.4 ov) Essex Women 104/9 (20 ov) | The Blaze won by 35 runs |
| 15 Jun 2025 | Essex Women 148/7 (20 ov) Surrey Women 150/5 (18.3 ov) | Surrey won by 5 wickets |
Frequently asked questions
What is the average first innings score at County Ground, Chelmsford in Women's T20 matches?
The average completed first-innings score at County Ground, Chelmsford in Women's T20 matches is 147.9 runs, from 20 innings between 2016 and 2026. Rain-affected matches decided by a rain rule are not included.
What is the highest total at County Ground, Chelmsford in Women's T20 matches?
The highest total in the data is 195/2 by Hampshire Women against Essex Women on 12 June 2025.
Do teams win more often batting first or chasing at County Ground, Chelmsford in Women's T20 matches?
In the 21 matches with a result, teams batting first won 9 (43%) and teams batting second won 12 (57%). These are past results, not a prediction.
What is the lowest total at County Ground, Chelmsford in Women's T20 matches?
The lowest all-out total in the data is 107 by Essex Women against Lancashire Women on 16 July 2025.
What is the highest successful run chase at County Ground, Chelmsford in Women's T20 matches?
The highest total reached while chasing and winning is 185.
More grounds in England
- County Ground, Bristol436 matches
- Edgbaston422 matches
- Kennington Oval394 matches
- The Rose Bowl383 matches
- Trent Bridge352 matches
- Old Trafford318 matches
- Lord's312 matches
- Headingley298 matches
Source: computed by CricketWise from Cricsheet ball-by-ball data (ODC-BY). Averages use completed innings in matches not decided by a rain rule. Definitions: methodology.